your article should be in APA Style
Download here the WORLD template
https://jabaas.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/TEMPLATE-FOR-ARTICLE-PREPARATION-23232.docxDownload REVIEW FORMAT BEFORE WRITING
SUBMIT COVER LETTER
your article should be in APA Style
Download here the WORLD template
SUBMIT COVER LETTER
How to write Good research Article and Get Published
Article by Prof. S. M. BHATT
mail your article to get free fair review @drbhatt or punjabhydroponics@gmail.com
Writing a good research article requires careful planning, organization, and adherence to specific guidelines. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you write a high-quality research article:
Table 1
Typical structure of a research paper
Introduction |
    State why the problem you address is important |
    State what is lacking in the current knowledge |
    State the objectives of your study or the research question |
Methods |
    Describe the context and setting of the study |
    Specify the study design |
    Describe the ‘population’ (patients, doctors, hospitals, etc.) |
    Describe the sampling strategy |
    Describe the intervention (if applicable) |
    Identify the main study variables |
    Describe data collection instruments and procedures |
    Outline analysis methods |
Results |
    Report on data collection and recruitment (response rates, etc.) |
    Describe participants (demographic, clinical condition, etc.) |
    Present key findings with respect to the central research question |
    Present secondary findings (secondary outcomes, subgroup analyses, etc.) |
Discussion |
    State the main findings of the study |
    Discuss the main results with reference to previous research |
    Discuss policy and practice implications of the results |
    Analyse the strengths and limitations of the study |
    Offer perspectives for future work |
Table 2
Common mistakes seen in manuscripts submitted to this journal
The research question is not specified |
The stated aim of the paper is tautological (e.g. ‘The aim of this paper is to describe what we did’) or vague (e.g. ‘We explored issues related to X’) |
The structure of the paper is chaotic (e.g. methods are described in the Results section) |
The manuscripts does not follow the journal’s instructions for authors |
The paper much exceeds the maximum number of words allowed |
The Introduction is an extensive review of the literature |
Methods, interventions and instruments are not described in sufficient detail |
Results are reported selectively (e.g. percentages without frequencies, P-values without measures of effect) |
The same results appear both in a table and in the text |
Detailed tables are provided for results that do not relate to the main research question |
In the Introduction and Discussion, key arguments are not backed up by appropriate references |
References are out of date or cannot be accessed by most readers |
The Discussion does not provide an answer to the research question |
The Discussion overstates the implications of the results and does not acknowledge the limitations of the study |
The paper is written in poor English |
Ref link https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article/16/3/191/1814554