The Blood Stain Pattern Analysis: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Reliability of Computerized Analysis, and Future Advancements
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) stands as a precious tool in the crime scene investigation and reconstruction, providing invaluable insights into the circumstances surrounding bloodshed. This comprehensive review delves into the profound significance of BPA, charting its evolution over time while spotlighting recent breakthroughs and identifying potential areas for further research and development, especially within the domain of digital technology.
The fundamental essence of BPA lies in meticulously analyzing the form and dispersion patterns of bloodstains found at crime scenes., which aids investigators in comprehending the deposition of blood on evidence and shedding light on the movements and positions of the individuals and objects involved during the incident. Notably, BPA facilitates differentiating between accidents, homicides, and suicides, as well as identifying bloodstains left by criminals, thus playing a crucial role in ascertaining the circumstances surrounding an incident. Elements like blood velocity and the nature of the impacted surface significantly influence the size and shape of bloodstains, imparting crucial clues for an accurate crime scene reconstruction.A noteworthy application of BPA is in impact spatter analysis on hands, which holds importance for forensic ballistic examiner to recognize the firearm. Studies are discussed, related to sophisticated image processing and computerized techniques for BPA to scrutinize their reliability and accuracy. Cutting-edge advances have been witnessed in the field, including the application of Raman spectroscopy, automated methodologies, and the utilization of software programs like the FARO Scene program. These advancements have substantially elevated the efficacy and capabilities of BPA, empowering forensic investigators with enhanced analytical tools. Despite the remarkable strides made in blood spatter pattern analysis, the review underscores the abundant potential for continued research and development. In particular, refinements in methods for dating dried blood pattern and the evolution of automated techniques for crime scene reconstruction are prime avenues worthy of exploration.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Attribution: You must credit the original creator, provide a link to the license, and indicate if you made changes. You can do this in any reasonable way, but you can't suggest that the original creator endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial: You can't use the material for commercial purposes.
- NoDerivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you can't distribute the modified material.
- You must own or control the copyright to the work.
- You can't revoke a CC license.
- Anyone who receives the material can rely on the license as long as the material is protected by copyright.
- If you created a work as part of your job, you might not own the copyright.
How to Cite
References
1. Singh P, Gupta N, Rathi R. Blood pattern analysis—a review and new findings. Egypt J Forensic Sci [Internet]. 2021;11(1):9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-021-00224-8
2. Hanson D. Bloodstain pattern analysis: recreating the scene of the crime. Law Enforcement Technology. 2004;31(84):86–8.
3. James SH, Kish PE, Sutton TP. Principles of bloodstain pattern analysis: theory and practice. CRC press; 2005.
4. Dryzal D. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: Applications and Challenges. DU Quark. 2018;2(2):22–9.
5. Finnis J, Lewis J, Davidson A. Comparison of methods for visualizing blood on dark surfaces. Science & Justice. 2013;53(2):178–86.
6. Smith FR, Nicloux C, Brutin D. A new forensic tool to date human blood pools. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8598.
7. Barni F, Lewis SW, Berti A, Miskelly GM, Lago G. Forensic application of the luminol reaction as a presumptive test for latent blood detection. Talanta [Internet]. 2007;72(3):896–913. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039914007000082
8. Cassidy BM, Lu Z, Martin JP, Tazik SK, Kellogg KW, DeJong SA, et al. A quantitative method for determining a representative detection limit of the forensic luminol test for latent bloodstains. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;278:396–403.
9. Bergman T, Klöden M, Dreßler J, Labudde D. Automatic Classification of Bloodstains with Deep Learning Methods. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz [Internet]. 2022;36(2):135–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-022-00760-y
10. Yen K, Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP, Peschel O, Zollinger U, Dirnhofer R. Blood-spatter patterns: hands hold clues for the forensic reconstruction of the sequence of events. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2003;24(2):132–40.
11. Bevel T. Ross M. Gardner bloodstain pattern analysis. Boca Raton. 2008;
12. Piotrowski E. Über Entstehung, Form, Richtung u. Ausbreitung der Blutspuren nach Hiebwunden des Kopfes. Slomski; 1895.
13. Shen AR, Brostow GJ, Cipolla R. Toward automatic blood spatter analysis in crime scenes. 2006;
14. Denison D, Porter A, Mills M, Schroter RC. Forensic implications of respiratory derived blood spatter distributions. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;204(1–3):144–55.
15. Park H, Son B, Seo Y, Lim S. Comparison of four saliva detection methods to identify expectorated blood spatter. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60(6):1571–6.
16. Comiskey PM, Yarin AL, Kim S, Attinger D. Prediction of blood back spatter from a gunshot in bloodstain pattern analysis. Phys Rev Fluids. 2016;1(4):043201.
17. Faflak R, Attinger D. Experimental study of how far blood spatter stains on fabrics can be found from the blood source, and relevance to crime scene reconstruction. Exp Fluids. 2021;62:1–17.
18. McCleary S, Liscio E, De Brabanter K, Attinger D. Automated reconstruction of cast-off blood spatter patterns based on Euclidean geometry and statistical likelihood. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;319:110628.
19. Hakim N, Liscio E. Calculating point of origin of blood spatter using laser scanning technology. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60(2):409–17.
20. Attinger D, Comiskey PM, Yarin AL, De Brabanter K. Determining the region of origin of blood spatter patterns considering fluid dynamics and statistical uncertainties. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;298:323–31.
21. Doty KC, Muro CK, Lednev IK. Predicting the time of the crime: Bloodstain aging estimation for up to two years. Forensic Chemistry. 2017;5:1–7.
22. Arthur RM, Humburg PJ, Hoogenboom J, Baiker M, Taylor MC, de Bruin KG. An image-processing methodology for extracting bloodstain pattern features. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;277:122–32.
23. Hołowko E, Januszkiewicz K, Bolewicki P, Sitnik R, Michoński J. Application of multi-resolution 3D techniques in crime scene documentation with bloodstain pattern analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;267:218–27.
24. Liu Y, Attinger D, De Brabanter K. Automatic classification of bloodstain patterns caused by gunshot and blunt impact at various distances. J Forensic Sci. 2020;65(3):729–43.
25. Holmes P. The Shepherd Murder Case. Bantam Books; 1961.
26. Pex JO, Vaughan CH. Observations of high velocity bloodspatter on adjacent objects. J Forensic Sci. 1987;32(6):1587–94.